Ugandan Judge Julia Sebutinde has come under scrutiny for her stance supporting Israel, raising questions about her judicial perspective and Uganda’s diplomatic relationship with Israel.
ICJ ruling: Judge Julia Sebutinde gets backlash for voting against South Africa
PLEASE NOTE: The third-party content below is shared on our platform for journalistic purposes. Swisher Post, its parent company, partners and affiliates shall not be held liable for any consequence that arises from the journalistic duties performed in sharing this content.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) recently delivered its provisional ruling on South Africa’s case against Israel, alleging genocide in Gaza.
The ICJ, comprising 15 judges and two ad hoc judges for this case, found South Africa’s claims against Israel plausible.
The court ordered Israel to take measures to prevent acts of genocide and provide basic services and humanitarian assistance in Gaza.
However, Judge Sebutinde’s position in favour of Israel has drawn attention, given the sensitive nature of the case and her African heritage.
Judge Sebutinde has had a distinguished legal career, starting in the Ministry of Justice in Uganda and later serving at the Special Court in Sierra Leone.
Her election to the ICJ in 2011 marked a significant milestone, being nominated by the national groups of Croatia, Denmark, and Uganda in the Permanent Court of Arbitration.
Her decision in the ICJ’s latest ruling is seen by some as controversial, especially considering Uganda’s historical and current relationship with Israel.
Uganda and Israel have maintained diplomatic relations, with Uganda often expressing support for Israel on various international platforms. This relationship has been strengthened by mutual interests in security, agriculture, and technology.
Julia Sebutinde’s tenure at the ICJ has been notable for her contributions to international justice. Her role in high-profile cases, including the one against former Liberian President Charles Taylor, has garnered respect and recognition.
However, her position in the South Africa vs. Israel case at the ICJ brings to light the complexities and nuances of international law and the diverse perspectives judges bring to the bench.
Here are some of the social media reactions to Sebutinde’s vote: